As every morning, after a visit to the bathroom and the kitchen, I go on the internet to see what happens in the world. Today the arguments with which to open the newspapers were varied: the emergence racism that is rampant in the country, the American economic crisis and its effects on our economy; the new wave of deaths at work, the manifestation of anti Gelmini Milano and its reform.
pity that the online editions of major national newspapers have opened with: "contraceptive methods that prevent the procreation of children distort the ultimate meaning of marriage" or otherwise referring to the new pearls of Ratzinger with regard to contraception. Why is not idiotic enough to publish similar between the arguments before, we must give prominence with a nice headline on the front page.
The articles will therefore sets out the thinking of people who talk about family issues and sexology, fields in which a bishop is assumed can not move easily, if only for lack of experience . As if one wanted to coach a football team, never having kicked a ball.
said, should be taken as your speech, analyze them in detail: why the Church condemns the use of condoms? Why - they say - kills a life in the bud ". Their argument: that a life is defined only when the male sperm meets egg female. But insisistono: "prevent procreation" . There, we got ourselves: it is precisely what we decide to use a condom, and only we decide for ourselves when it's time to procreate.
I could understand and respect - and obviously do not share - like a speech about abortion, where it is scientifically difficult to determine when an embryo (or fetus) can be considered human life. But I find it embarrassing to discuss even in 2008 on the legality of using a condom. One reason above all: someone explained it to him to Ratzinger in the world there are 40 million people living with AIDS, most of which lives in a poor continent - economically and culturally - called Africa?
0 comments:
Post a Comment